Tag Archives: character theory

Polynomials and Representations XXVIII

Starting from this article, we will look at representations of . Now, itself is extremely complicated so we will only focus on representations of particular types. Generally, for any topological group G, we want: to be a continuous homomorphism of groups. Continuous … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Polynomials and Representations XXVII

From the previous article, we have columns j < j’  in the column tabloid U, and given a set A (resp. B) of boxes in column j (resp. j’), we get:    where is the column tabloid obtained by swapping contents of A with B while preserving the order. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Polynomials and Representations XXIII

Power-Sum Polynomials We will describe how the character table of is related to the expansion of the power-sum symmetric polynomials in terms of monomials. Recall: where exactly since is not defined. Now each irrep of is of the form  for some … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Polynomials and Representations XXI

We have established that all irreps of are defined over and hence any field of characteristic 0. For convenience we will fix . Twists For any group G and representation over  if is a group homomorphism, we can twist as follows: Sometimes, we also … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Polynomials and Representations XX

From now onwards, we will assume the base field K has characteristic 0. Example: d=3 Following the previous article, we examine the case of . We get 3 partitions: , and Let us compute for all From the previous article, we have: Since , is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Polynomials and Representations XIX

Representations of the Symmetric Group Let [d] be the set {1,…,d}, and Sd be the group of bijections  From here on, we shall look at the representations of Note that this requires a good understanding of representation theory (character theory) of finite groups. To start, let … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Modular Representation Theory (IV)

Continuing our discussion of modular representation theory, we will now discuss block theory. Previously, we saw that in any ring R, there is at most one way to write where is a set of orthogonal and centrally primitive idempotents. If such an … Continue reading

Posted in Notes | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Modular Representation Theory (III)

Let’s work out some explicit examples of modular characters. First, we have a summary of the main results. Let be the modular characters of the simple k[G]-modules; they form a basis of Let  be those of the projective indecomposable k[G]-modules; they form a basis … Continue reading

Posted in Notes | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Modular Representation Theory (II)

We continue our discussion of modular representations; recall that all modules are finitely-generated even if we do not explicitly say so. First, we introduce a new notation: for each projective finitely-generated k[G]-module P, we have a unique projective finitely-generated R[G]-module denoted for which … Continue reading

Posted in Notes | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Modular Representation Theory (I)

Let K be a field and G a finite group. We know that when char(K) does not divide |G|, the group algebra K[G] is semisimple. Conversely we have: Proposition. If char(K) divides |G|, then K[G] is not semisimple. Proof Let , a two-sided … Continue reading

Posted in Notes | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment