Segre Embedding
Throughout this article, k is a fixed algebraically closed field. We wish to construct the product in the category of quasi-projective varieties.
For our first example, let be the projective variety defined by the homogeneous equation
. We define maps
as follows
Note that the maps are well-defined: if then since
we have
.
Proposition 1.
The triplet
is a product in the category of quasi-projective varieties.
Proof
Let be a quasi-projective variety and
be morphisms. We will define the corresponding
as follows. For each
, there is an open neighbourhood U of w such that
and
where
are homogeneous of the same degree and either
or
has no zero in U. Same holds for
.
Now define by
. Clearly the image of f lies in V so we get a morphism
. It is easy to see that
and
. Repeating this construction over an open cover of W, we obtain our desired
. ♦
Using similar techniques, we can show the following.
Proposition 2.
For any
, the product
exists in the category of quasi-projective varieties and is a projective variety.
Specifically, the product is the image of the Segre embedding
,
where the projective coordinates of are indxed by
with
and
.
We denote the image of this map by .
Exercise A
Prove that is the closed subspace of
defined by
over all
.
Products of Quasi-Projective Varieties
Proposition 3.
If
and
are open (resp. closed), so is the image of
in
.
In particular, the topology on
is at least as fine as the product topology.
Proof
It suffices to prove the case where and
are open. Pick any
and
; without loss of generality say
.
Since is open in
there exists a homogeneous
such that
. Similarly, there exists a homogeneous
such that
. Then
so the image of in V is open. ♦
As in the product of affine varieties, the topology on
is in general strictly finer than the product topology. This is already clear in the case m = n = 1, since
has the cofinite topology.
Corollary 1.
The product of two projective (resp. quasi-projective) varieties exists and is projective (resp. quasi-projective).
Note
In the following proof, we say a subset of a topological space is locally closed if it is an intersection of an open subset and a closed subset. Thus every quasi-projective variety (resp. quasi-affine variety) is a locally closed subspace of some (resp.
).
Prove the following properties as a simple exercise:
- an intersection of two locally closed subsets is locally closed;
- if Y is a locally closed subset of X and Z is a locally closed subset of Y then Z is a locally closed subset of X;
- a subset Y of X is locally closed if and only if Y is open in its closure in X.
Proof
If and
are closed (resp. locally closed), so is the image W of
in
by proposition 3. The projections
and
then restrict to
and
.
Let us show that is the product of
and
in the category of quasi-projective varieties.
If X is any quasi-projective variety and ,
are any morphisms then
and
induce
; the image of f lies in W so we obtain an induced
. ♦
Exercise B
1. Let be the set of points
satisfying
. Find a set of homogeneous polynomials in
which define the image of W.
2. More generally prove that a subset is closed if and only if its corresponding subset
is the set of solutions of some bihomogeneous polynomials
,
i.e. F is homogeneous as a polynomial in as well as
.

Dimensions
Lemma 1.
For any point
in a quasi-projective variety V, there is an open neighbourhood U,
, which is affine.
Proof
Suppose is a locally closed subset. Without loss of generality,
so
is contained in
, a locally closed subset of
. Now W is open in
, its closure in
. By an analogue of proposition 1 here, we can pick a basis of the topological space
in the form of
, where
Thus for some we have
. Now we are done since
is isomorphic to the affine variety with coordinate ring
. ♦
Exercise C
Prove that if V and W are irreducible quasi-projective varieties, then is also irreducible. Again, please be reminded that
is not the product topology.
Proposition 4.
if V and W are quasi-projective varieties, then
.
Proof
Suppose V and W are irreducible; by lemma 1 we can pick open affine subsets and
. Then
is an open affine subset of the quasi-projective variety
, which is irreducible by exercise C. Now
.
where the first and third equalities follow from proposition 3 here and the second is from proposition 2 here,
The general case is left as an exercise (write V and W as unions of irreducible components). ♦
Finally, we consider the dimension of the cone of a projective variety.
Proposition 5.
Let
be a non-empty closed subset. Then
.
Proof
Without loss of generality, suppose ; by proposition 3 here,
and V’ is a closed subset of
. Also since cone(V’) is open in cone(V) we have
. Now there is an isomorphism
Hence . ♦