In this article, we will consider algebraic geometry in the projective space. Throughout this article, k denotes an algebraically closed field.
Projective Space
Definition.
Let
. On the set
, we consider the equivalence relation:
The projective n-space
is the set of equivalence classes under this relation. An element of
is denoted by
for any representative
.
For example .
The above only defines as a set; we need some geometric structure on it for the concept to be meaningful. Throughout this article we will fix
, which is graded by degree.
Definition.
Suppose
is homogeneous and
. We write
if
.
Note that the value is in general not well-defined. Indeed if we have two representatives
for
, then
Despite this, if and only if
so the definition is sensible. As in the case of the affine n-space, we will define a correspondence between ideals of B and subsets of
.
Definition.
Let
be a graded ideal. Write
.
For a finite sequence of homogeneous polynomials
we also write
for
where
.
Also let
.
Exercise A
Prove the following, for any graded ideals and collection of graded ideals
of B.
.
- If
is a set of homogeneous generators of
, then
.
.
.
In the other direction, we define:
Definition.
Let
be any subset. Then
denotes the (graded) ideal of B generated by:
.
In summary, we defined the following maps.
Zariski Topology of Projective Space
We wish to define the Zariski topology on ; for that let us take subsets of
which can be identified with the affine space
. Fix
; let
Note that for the same point can be represented by
where the i-th coordinate is 1. This gives a bijection
. E.g. for n = 2, we have:
Note that for any , the intersection
maps to an open subset of
via both
and
. Indeed if i < j then
is the set of all
satisfying
while
is the set of all
satisfying
. Hence, the following is well-defined.
Definition.
The Zariski topology on
is defined by specifying every
as an open subset, where
obtains the Zariski topology of
from
.
A projective variety is a closed subspace
.
First, we have the following preliminary results.
Lemma 1.
For any homogeneous
, the set
is (Zariski) closed in
.
Proof
It suffices to show that is closed in
for each
. But
, where
. The same holds for
. ♦
Definition.
For any
, let
be its homogenization.
Exercise B
1. Prove that if , the homogenization of fg is the product of the homogenizations of f and g.
2. Let be the homogenization of a non-constant
. Then f is irreducible if and only if F is irreducible. [ Hint: you may find lemma 2 here helpful. ]
The Zariski topology on is consistent with our earlier notions of closed subsets:
Proposition 1.
A subset
is closed under the Zariski topology if and only if
for some graded ideal
.
Proof
(⇐) Suppose for some homogeneous
. Since
, by lemma 1 this is Zariski closed.
(⇒) Let ; it suffices to show that any
is contained in
for some homogeneous
. Now
is contained in some
, say
without loss of generality. Hence
for some
. If
, then
, where F = homogenization of f. ♦
Example
Let be the projective variety defined by the homogeneous equation
. Then
is cut out from
by
;
is cut out from
by
;
is cut out from
by
.
Cone of Projective Variety
We wish to prove the bijective correspondence between graded radical ideals of B and closed subsets . For that, we can piggyback on existing results for the affine case.
Definition.
Let
be any subset. The cone of C is
.
Note
For any non-empty collection of subsets we have
Also, we have:
Lemma 2.
If
is a proper graded ideal then
.
In particular, by proposition 1, the cone of a closed
is closed in
.
Proof
Note: if is non-constant homogeneous, then
. Now pick a set of homogeneous generators
for
; each
is non-constant so
.
This completes the proof. ♦
Furthermore we have:
Lemma 3.
A non-empty closed subset
is of the form
for some closed
if and only if
.
When that happens, we call W a closed cone in
.
Proof
(⇒) is obvious; for (⇐) clearly W = cone(V) for some subset . Let
so that
. It remains to show
is graded, for we would get
by lemma 2.
Indeed if , write
as a sum of homogeneous components. Then for any
and
we have
which gives
Thus vanish for any
, i.e.
. ♦
Projective Nullstellensatz
Thus we have the following correspondences:
The top-left column is a bijection by lemma 3; the bottom row is a bijection by Nullstellensatz. In the proof of lemma 3, we also showed that for a closed cone , the ideal
is graded. Conversely, if
is graded,
is the (non-empty) solution set of a collection of graded polynomials; hence it is a closed cone too.
Hence we have a bijection between
- closed subsets
, and
- proper homogeneous radical ideals
.
The correspondence takes and so
The last piece of the puzzle is the map which takes closed subsets of
to homogeneous ideals of B. As an easy exercise, show that
.
However so we modify our bijection to:
Theorem (Projective Nullstellensatz).
There is a bijection between:
- closed subsets
;
- homogeneous radical ideals
such that
where
is the irrelevant ideal of B.
Exercise C
Prove that if is a homogeneous ideal then
is empty if and only if
contains a power of
.
[ Hint: prove that the radical of 𝔞 is either (1) or B+. ]