Tensor Product of A-Algebras
Proposition 1.
Let B, C be A-algebras. Their tensor product
has a natural structure of an A-algebra which satisfies
.
Proof
Fix . The map
is A-bilinear so it induces an A-linear map
Now varying (b, c) gives an A-bilinear map ,
so it induces an A-linear
i.e. an A-bilinear map . Note that A-bilinearity means distributivity in either term. To prove associativity, show that it holds on the pure tensors (exercise). ♦
It turns out this is the coproduct of B and C in the category of A-algebras. This was briefly aluded to earlier.
Proposition 2.
Let
with A-algebra homomorphisms
If E is an A-algebra and
,
are A-algebra homomorphisms, then there is a unique A-algebra homomorphism
such that
and
.
Proof
The A-bilinear map induces the A-linear map
.
To check that it is a ring homomorphism, it suffices to take the pure tensors, and show that .
Clearly for
, and conversely, any such f must satisfy
which uniquely determines f. ♦
Examples
1. Induced Algebra
In the above suppose we fix B and take the functor
This functor satisfies the universal property: for any B-algebra D we have
In fact, this is a general property from category theory.
Lemma 1.
If
is an object, and
is the coproduct of B and C, then for each
in
we have a natural isomorphism
where
is the canonical map and
is the coslice category.
Exercise A
Do at least one of the following.
- Prove the universal property directly.
- Prove the lemma and use it to prove the universal property.
2. Polynomial Ring
We have for any A-algebra B. There is more than one way to show it.
Proof 1: use the fact that is free over A with basis
for
, so
is free over B with the same basis. Show that product in this ring still satisfies
so it is isomorphic to
.
Proof 2: for any B-algebra C, example 1 gives
as sets functorially in C. Since we also have , the result follows by Yoneda lemma.
3. Localization
Let B be an A-algebra with given homomorphism . If
is a multiplicative subset, then
as A-modules as we saw earlier. Clearly the isomorphism preserves the ring structure so we get an isomorphism of A-modules.
Technically you have to localise with respect to a multiplicative subset of the ring, so it would be more correct to write where
.
What is ? This is the set of primes
such that
In other words under the continuous map
.
4. Quotient
Let B be an A-algebra with given homomorphism . If
is an ideal, then
as A-modules. Again it is in fact an isomorphism of A-algebras. Now
is the set of primes
such that
.
Thus .
Exercise B
For ideals , describe
.
Let where
is a collection of polynomials. Describe the functor
.
Geometric Applications
Throughout this section, k denotes an algebraically closed field.
Fibre of a Morphism
Let be a ring homomorphism and
be a prime ideal. Substitute
in example 4 and
in example 3. Thus the set of
such that
is given by:
where is the residue field of A at
.
Definition.
Let
be a morphism of affine k-schemes, which corresponds to a ring homomorphism
. For a given point
, its fibre is the affine k-scheme
with coordinate ring:
Example
Let and
with morphism
,
. Algebraically, this is:
.
For the point , we have
so that
The point , on the other hand, gives
.
Geometrically, V is a family of ellipses parametrized by the parameters a, b, c.
Product of Varieties
Suppose ,
are closed subsets. Then
is also closed, being cut out by the same equations which define V and W, but with disjoint sets of variables.
The topology for
is generally much finer than the product topology of V and W. For example, prove this for
as an easy exercise.
Lemma 2.
.
Proof
The projection maps induce k-algebra homomorphisms
and hence
; h is surjective by our concrete description of
above.
For injectivity, let S be a basis of . Suppose
for some
and
. Thus
.
If we fix w, we get a linear relation which holds in
. Since the
‘s are linearly independent,
for all
so each
and
. ♦
Corollary 1.
If k is an algebraically closed field and A, B are finitely generated reduced k-algebras, then so is
.
Proof
Indeed A, B are isomorphic to k[V], k[W] for some k-varieties V and W. Apply the above. ♦
Exercise C
Find a counter-example when k is not algebraically closed. [ Hint: you need a base field of positive characteristic. ]
Intersection
Finally, we leave the following as an exercise.
Exercise D
Let be closed subvarieties of a variety V. This induces surjective k-algebra homomorphisms
and
. Write down the coordinate ring of the scheme intersection
using the language of tensor product.
Question to Ponder
Intuitively, there seems to be some commonality among the above three constructions. Explain this in terms of category theory. [ Hint: you might want to wait until the article on fibre products. ]
In the sentence before second proposition is it ” .. .in the category of A-Algebras” instead of $A-modules”?
Indeed! Thanks again. 🙂